Reconceptualizing the Green Climate Fund’s Project Reconsideration Pro…
페이지 정보
작성자 관리자 작성일17-02-28 00:00 조회68회 댓글0건관련링크
본문
Accountability
1)
Laura Henny*
Contents
Ⅰ. Introduction
Ⅱ. Analysis of the GCF’s Accountability
Ⅲ. The Case for GCF Project Decision Reconsideration as a Form of Institutional
Review
Ⅳ. Conclusions
【Abstract】
This article addresses the design of the project reconsideration procedure
of the Green Climate Fund (“GCF”). Operationalized in 2014, the GCF and
its governance have been bootstrapped steadily since the Cancun Meeting of
the UNFCCC Conference of the Parties in 2010. The GCF’s Board of
Directors must now institute a procedure that fulfills the right of eligible
developing countries to request review of a decision denying funding to a
proposed project, but the details of the procedures’ design are still under
discussion. After reviewing the GCF’s project selection procedures and
evaluating its institutional accountability mechanisms, I propose that the
project reconsideration procedure be robustly designed so as to provide
institutional review of the GCF’s project selection procedure. Constituting the
project reconsideration this way will strengthen GCF’s administrative
accountability to the least developed and most climate-vulnerable States of
* Assistant Professor, Sunkyunkwan University School of Law
232 環境法硏究 第38卷 2號
the UNFCCC.
1)
Laura Henny*
Contents
Ⅰ. Introduction
Ⅱ. Analysis of the GCF’s Accountability
Ⅲ. The Case for GCF Project Decision Reconsideration as a Form of Institutional
Review
Ⅳ. Conclusions
【Abstract】
This article addresses the design of the project reconsideration procedure
of the Green Climate Fund (“GCF”). Operationalized in 2014, the GCF and
its governance have been bootstrapped steadily since the Cancun Meeting of
the UNFCCC Conference of the Parties in 2010. The GCF’s Board of
Directors must now institute a procedure that fulfills the right of eligible
developing countries to request review of a decision denying funding to a
proposed project, but the details of the procedures’ design are still under
discussion. After reviewing the GCF’s project selection procedures and
evaluating its institutional accountability mechanisms, I propose that the
project reconsideration procedure be robustly designed so as to provide
institutional review of the GCF’s project selection procedure. Constituting the
project reconsideration this way will strengthen GCF’s administrative
accountability to the least developed and most climate-vulnerable States of
* Assistant Professor, Sunkyunkwan University School of Law
232 環境法硏究 第38卷 2號
the UNFCCC.
댓글목록
등록된 댓글이 없습니다.
